Thursday, February 19, 2009

The Boys' Room: Progress Update

I haven't forgotten Orthodoxy 101: Part 2, the forthcoming response to yesterday's Orthodoxy 101: Part 1. Believe me, this whole conversion thing is the only thing on my mind, besides baby proofing, our shortage of diapers, laundry, and what in the world I'll feed my kids for lunch. But I need to take a respite from thinking too deeply, and so I will instead direct your attention to the progress we're making on J and B's aqua and chocolate-striped bedroom.



(Sorry for the poor lighting. Lots of sunshine hits their room in the morning.)

The boys' color scheme has always been chocolate and aqua ("chocqua," apparently, is an accepted term over at Better Homes and Gardens), before the combination was popular and wide-spread and easy to find in nursery bedding. I got my inspiration for the fabric from a diaper bag my mom bought me at the crib store where we bought the sleigh crib and matching changing table. (The story behind the mismatched cribs is that I picked out the gorgeous and very expensive sleigh crib and changing table well before I knew I was having twins. Once I finally found out, at 5 months, I didn't have enough money to buy a matching sleigh crib and had to instead opt for the matching but much less pricey Jenny Lind version. Thus J looks like our favored son.) Anyway, I wanted the fabric from the diaper bag used in the nursery, and so I turned to my Grammy, seamstress extraordinaire. The lady who made the diaper bag gave me all the links to the fabric online, and so I ordered it, found patterns, and sent it all to my Grammy, who churned out two beautiful valances, two quilts (with Minky fabric!), two crib skirts, and two bumper pads, all in the coordinating toile/polka dot/striped brown and blue fabrics.


(See C poking around in B's inferior crib?)
Obviously we're not using the bumper pads right now. Also obviously, we're still not finished with the room. We have lots of stuff to hang on the walls (they did have a complete nursery once upon a time, when we lived in Oxford and thought we'd be hanging around for awhile), but I'm holding off on that until B and J transition to their big boy beds and I can give C some of their baby furniture. This will happen soon, and I'll post more in the future when we have a more permanent set-up for them. They are so patient with me.
The bright blue actually works really well in this room. It's a small bedroom with weird lines and angles that could very easily look much smaller with the wrong paint. I was afraid the dark brown and the black of the alcove (see below) would feel claustrophobic, but the blue balances everything out. I lucked out on that one.
Oh, and did you see that lamp? I'm proud of that. I made the cover for that lamp using remnant material and ribbon and hot glue. Just don't look too closely.
Also, that chest and the nightstand in the next photo were in my room when I was a baby.


OK, that's the partially finished alcove. See the painter's tape? It's still there because one quart of chalkboard paint wasn't quite enough. So we need to run out and get another quart and slap on one more coat before we can get busy with the chalk. I have grand plans to transform that alcove into a reading nook, since our boys seem on track to be true blue bibliophiles.
They make us very proud.


Here's a slightly dark shot of what the fabric looks like. Again, we've used three coordinating patterns: striped, polka dot, and toile. It works really well. I used to have all the links for this particular fabric, but I seemed to have deleted them from my bookmarks to make room for all of C's bedding links. If you're interested, I can do some digging for you. And the paint is Sherwin Williams. I have the names of the colors somewhere, too, if you want to know them.


Finally, little J, curled up in his crib and forever convincing me that he's not ready, not ready at all, to transition to a real bed. He slept through the entire photo shoot, despite the shrieks of joy coming from his brother (B likes to wake up and play) and the gurgles of contentment coming from his sister in the next crib over.
I just love making babies.
(This has recently become a point of contention between my husband and me, as he is determined to stick to his "No Babies in 2009" New Year's Resolution. I argue that I can get pregnant in 2009 and not deliver until next year and still fulfill his resolution. He disagrees. Let me know where you weigh in on this argument.)
And... hurray for chocqua!

12 comments:

Bean said...

I agree with you Christine. You can have your summer of shorts, get pregnant after summertime and deliver in 2009. Steve would still successfully complete his NYR.

4cunninghams said...

I have to say, I'm on your side with this one. The resolution wasn't no pregnancy but not babies in 2009. Men must learn they ahve to be VERY specific with women. We made a resolution in 2008 to have no pregnancies so we got a dog instead. Now we're hoping for a "end of 2009" baby. I like late fall babies!

The room looks great by the way!

Janie said...

Beautiful room! I can't wait to see it in person.

I hope your argument with Stephen is not serious; how can it be?! You won't post a serious argument on the blog for the whole world to see!! (Please ignore the rhyme).

So, if it's not serious, I'll weigh in (for whatever its worth or not worth). Um. I think Anne of Green Gables spaced her kids out more. She never had four under three.

You don't want too many monkeys jumping on the bed!

You know I want six to seven kids myself, and you know if I want them b/f I'm fifty I better start soon, but I think I'd rather have them at least two years apart... to enjoy & savor & not get stressed out. Besides, poor Ryan would go nuts-o w/ that many crying, poohing little ones.

So, I'm on brother's side! No pregnancy in 2009!

Steve said...

I think everyone should weigh in on this debate. We can plan our family structure based on imput from the blog-o-sphere community. And we can name the new baby after the blog . . . Bloggo, Bloggy, Blogson, etc. Just remember, every reader's vote counts as one while mine vote counts as 999, so you need 1000 readers to vote for a new baby in order to make it stick. (And even so, Jack, Baylor, and I reserve veto rights.)

The Nester said...

LOVE IT!

and i'm so 1999 I had no idea that cocqua or whatever it is is an acceptable term--how great is that?

Gamma said...

Bring on those babies!!!! They're like shoes...you can never have too many!

Gallo Pinto2 said...

I'm with Christine! She can get pregnant and not actually deliver a baby until 2010 and you'd still be keeping your resolution Steve :)

But I'm obsessed with babies and want at least 4 of my own someday....(and I think that freaks out someone in my life!)....So someday Christine I may need YOUR help!

As far as the boys room! I LOVE it!

MELISSA said...

I love chocqua! I am hopefully going to re-decorate our master bedroom in this color scheme. Beautiful job!

Raechel said...

It's fun to see this coming along! I love the chalkboard paint thing - I'm still trying to convince Ryan that we need it and then trying to figure out where. Maybe Oliver's "clubhouse".

The chocqua is beautiful and the boys are lucky to have a mommy with such good taste!

Yay, color!

Raechel said...

Oh, and "yay, babies!" too!

B. Jeffrey Vidt said...

Well, it all depends on when you believe life occurs; at conception, at birth, or somewhere inbetween. I think you should have about 7 kids, and start naming them after the transformers. I think that might be an agreeable compromise.

Susan said...

I disagree (Oh. I'm a friend of Raechel's, by the way). He didn't say no "life" in 2009--that would be silly. He said no babies. This leaves ample room for embryos and fetuses a-plenty.

I say, catch him on the technicality and make him regret that he left such an obvious loophole. With triplets.